目录 前言 Chapter One IntroductiontotheStudy 1．1 Introduction 1．2 Problem Statement：Reality of China’S Copyright Protection versustheExpectationsoftheUnitedStates 1．3 westerrdGreco．Roman Rhetorical Tradition 1．4 U．S．CulturalValuesandBeliefs 1．5 ChineseRhetoricalHeritage 1．6 ChineseCulturalValuesandBeliefs 1．7 Global Copyright Practice and the U．S China Debate 1．8 RhetoriC：A General Defmition and its Relatedness to the Project 1．9 Rhetoric and the U．S China Copyright Approaches： Meta-Methods． 1．10 Conclusion
Chapter Two Methods 2．1 Introduction 2．2 Main Research Question and Sub-Questions 2．3 Quantitative and Qualitative Methods versus Rhetorical Criticism 2．4 Why Comparative Rhetorical Approach 2．5 Cluster Analysis： An Approach to Articulate the Author's Intention on the Audience 2．6 Intercultural Rhetoric/Communication： The Approach to Cultural Values and Beliefs as Well as Behaviors 2．7 Marxist Criticism： An Ideological Approach to the U．S．- China Conflicts over Copyright Practice 2．8 Researcher Role 2．9 Research Materials 2．10 Conclusion
Chapter Three Rhetorical Tradtions and Western（U．S．）/Chinese Legal （Copyright） Approaches——A Cluster Analysis 3．1 Introduction 3．2 Rule by Law or Rule by Man： The Concept of Virtue/Ethos in Early Greco/Roman and Chinese Rhetorical Traditions-．- 3．3 Plato's Concept of Virtue in Protagoras 3．4 Ethos as Human Character in Aristotle's On Rhetoric 3．5 Cicero's Ideal Orator in De Oratore 3．6 Chinese Rhetorical Tradition： Confucianism and Daoism 3．7 Western and Chinese Concept of Virtue/Ethos and its Potential Impact on U．S． and Chinese Legal （Copyright） Approaches： A Comparison and Contrast 3．8 Conclusion
Chapter Four The Impact of Cultural Traditions on the U．S． and China Legal/Copyright Approaches——the Cultural Dimensions 4．1 Introduction 4．2． U．S． Cultural Dimensions： Cultural Values and Beliefs Revealed in the Declaration of Independence and the U．S． Constitution 4．3 Universalism， Individualism， and Low Power Distance： U．S． Cultural Dimensions and Values and Beliefs 4．4 Chinese Cultural Dimensions： Cultural Values and Beliefs Revealed in the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and Deng Xiaoping's Southern Tour Speeches 4．5 Particularism， Collectivism， and High Power Distance： Chinese Cultural Dimensions and Values and Beliefs 4．6 Cultural Dimensions and Their Potential Impact on the U．S．-China Copyright Approaches： A Comparison and Contrast 4．7 Conclusion
Chapter Five The U．S． and Chinese Approaches to Copyright Practice—An Ideological Criticism 5．1 Introduction 5．2 Global Copyright Protection： From Internationalization to Globalization 5．3 The U．S．-China Copyright Conflicts： The 1992 MOU and the 1995 U．S．-China IP Agreement 5．4 The Ideology of the Conflict： Implications for the U． S． and Chinese Copyright Approaches 5．5 Conclusion
Chapter Six Discussions and Conclusions 6．1 Introduction 6．2 Summary of Research Results 6．3 Conclusions 6．4 Recommendations for the Discipline and Policy Makers 6．5 Limitations of the Study 6．6 Contributions References
内容摘要 《中美版权争议的修辞学研究（英文版）/英语博士文库》： Collectivism／communitarianism "encourages members （of the group） to leave a legacy to society， neighborhood， and family， which lasts beyond the individual life" （Hampden—Tumer and Trompenaars， 2000， p.79）.This is to say that people on the collectivist side are integrated， from birth on， into extended in—groups that prioritize collective and inner group interests over indivdual ones （Hofstede， 2001）.China is the lowest individualist country among the countries investigated—showing the characteristics of "'we' consciousness， collective orientation， particularist， membership ideal， less consciousness of private life， activities imposed by context， traditional society" （Hofstede， 2001， p.227）.For instance， for a long time in China， a formal copyright law was entirely missing in the legal discourse.Authors were not benefited much from their creations because copyrights belonged to the nation.In return for their work， they received a very small manuscript fee. Power distance， the last cultural dimension to be discussed in this chapter， refers to the extent to which a society accepts human inequality （Hofstede， 2001， p.79）.
占位居中
直播中，去观看